Is it worth a read?

No, but it'll probably take you two hours to read if you really wanted to.

>>9969445
read Umberto Eco's "Foucault's Pendulum" instead. it has more content than dun brown's work, and is funnier besides.

>>9969445
No.
People say Dan Brown might not have literary and historical merits, but at least he writes good plots. But he does not - I predicted the ending after the first 30 mins of the movie.
Probably Eco (Name of the Rose) instead, haven't read it but classic is a classic.

>>9969445
No. If you like this sort of thing, just read Eco.

>>9969445
it was okay-ish but the ending sucked as all brown's endings do. not worth it.

watch the movie instead; it's got plenty of mystery but the payoff isn't worth it

angels and demons is a good read though, just don't kid yourself that it's anything more than pulp