who's read it?
You mean, Who's RED it???
>>9965216
>>9965216
Stop that
My friend has a copy. Personally I found it a bit bullshitty. And I say that as someone who enjoys Jung's psychological works.
First of all, the book is poorly designed. The english translation is separated from the illustrations and the overall book itself is large and unwieldy.
Secondly, I found the contents somewhat boring while skimming through. It's like listening to someone else's dream. Interesting for the person who experienced it but not interesting for the listener.
>>9965237
>like listening to someone else's dream. Interesting for the person who experienced it but not interesting for the listener.
This, especially since the analysis is all pointless and repetitive jungian bullshit, but skipping that you may still find his tellings occasionally interesting, at least more often than just any person or friend's dreams
I thought this was a thread about mao's.