who is his successor? spinoza? GEM and/or her husband?

>>9962435
Ray Comfort.

>>9962435
Pretty much the entire Western Tradition

>>9962435
Cajetan, Suarez, Newman (not directly tho), Boskovic, Maritain, Gilson, Garrigou-Lagrange, MacIntyre, Anscombe, Geach, Feser, Oderberg.
>>9962528
Not exactly. Hume and Kant for example had a very poor understanding of Aquinas and probably never actually read him.

>>9962544
Philosophy was never dead in the middle ages and Aquinas didn't revive it.

>>9962492
>Ray Comfort
>Not Rick Warren
>trying to prove God using science, bananas, dinosaur bones, mixed in with idiotic creationism instead of finding ones purpose and discovering ones Self in relation to the Almighty Lord of Creation.
>making all of Christianity look stupid using a single banana (the fruit which was forbidden by God)

Nice try, Satan.

>>9962601
I was trying to conflate all Christian thought. There's no difference between Aquinas/Augustine and Ray Comfort/that duck dynasty guy to me.

>>9962932
This is next level brainletism.

>>9963314
Compensating for your own brainletism there?

>>9962932
That's because you are fucking retarded.

You know that schoalsiticsm dominated European Philosophy for almost a millennia right?

>>9965385
Scholasticism existed in the form we know since the 12th century and entered a decadent stage by the 17th, so I'd say it's 500 and not 1000 years.

>>9962435
Dante Alighieri

The only medieval philosopher who matters is Nicholas of Cusa.

>>9965785
Ramon Llull, too.