is this good? please respond to my fucking thread dont scroll past it
>>9947542
I actually enjoyed it a lot. Just a heads up the author, like once or twice, will just go off on random tangents about his individual political beliefs. Another section, an early one, describes how skeletons in Africa imply that some black people today are technically not homosapiens and are of a different skeletal structure or something, and he provides proof of this, but then immediately says something like "but this can't be true because that would be racist." Understand that he intentionally mentions these things likely as a defense against any SJWs who would protest and riot outside his office.
>>9947563
Same guy here. You should 100% read it, aside from the slight virtue signaling to cover his ass fro, the hostile left, it's a brilliant work. It gives a great insight into how humans developed from an evolutionary standpoint and provides a great perspective on how our behavior is very similar to cave men, just with different toys. I think it's esssential nonfiction.
>>9947563
This. He cleverly managed avoiding polemic stuff in order to be a succesful realease. He also got his political opinions here and there, but just inform yourself on the man and you shold be fine.
>>9947542
(((Yuval Noah Harari)))
I skimmed this in the book store and the entire thing is pop-history feces
may God have mercy on your soul
I know two people who partially read it, one just stopped, the other found it super interesting but is just an idiot. From what I gathered it was a bunch of absolutely insane ramblings.
I'm reading it right now. My father let me borrow it. It's pretty good.