Is slave morality really such a bad thing?
If you're a liberal, then no.
>>9941270
nope, not at all, anon.
>>9941270
As long as you're not aware of it, sure. That's how most people find 'fulfilment' in life
In Hegel's dichotomy not at all
Not that I fully understand it, but it seems to be fine
>>9941552
>In Hegel's dichotomy not at all
your right.
the slave finds his identity through the master and his labour. Marx went on with this identity-conflict and tried to free the working slave from his masters chains
>>9941270
submit
There are many positive values in a slave's morality. Positive being the traditional Western-Democratic socially liberal ethos of freedom, liberty and pursuit of happiness and Christian values of love thy neighbor and altruism.
One should not get caught up in the naming of the it as a slave morality. You can also view master/slave as vertical/horizontal.
A soceity needs both men and Niestzche himself comments that most men have a combination of both in them.
>>9941270
Nietzsche didn't think so. He thought the Jews were a remarkable people, for example, and he also attributed to them the development of the greatest formulated slave morality in human history. Both master and slave moralities have their ups and downs, their place in the world, because the world and everything in it is will to power and nothing besides.
>>9941270
You're either a slave to God or a slave to the Devil(Faustian spirit) doesn't matter if you don't believe in the supernatural because those demons don't care if you think that they don't exist as long as you do their bidding.
>>9942485
>You're either a slave to God or a slave to the Devil(Faustian spirit)
Except in the case where you don't feel yourself a slave at all, since "master" and "slave" are just sensations.
What's slave morality?
>>9942519
A moral system that places yourself outside the central positions of power.