Has his proof of God ever been disputed?
>>9936697
Yes. It was disputed by Aquinas before him based on the principle of identity and unity and by Garrigou-Lagrange later on in more detail in God, His Existence and His Nature.
His proof follows perfectly from his definitions and axioms, so we can't dispute it. However we can say that his definitions and axioms are just words with only a vague meaning.
>>9937228
>However we can say that his definitions and axioms are just words with only a vague meaning
mind if i use that for a smuggie m8?