stack thread

File: 1451171514426.jpg (6KB, 199x253px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 199x253px

>>9926830

The sum of their parts somehow looks way worse...

>>9926830
>B&N
yikes

>>9926872
Are the Bulgakoff and Dostoevsky both P&V?

>le same 30-odd meme books

>>9926878
Brothers K yes.
m&m is glenny

>>9926830
Why would someone make leatherbound editions of Dan Brown and Star Wars novelizations? Is this a joke?

>>9926830
>no culture of critique

>>9926899
Go away, Kevin.

>>9926888
Why Glenny over P&V?

>>9926830
>spending $100s of dollars on expensive editions of books that have clearly never been read

so this is the power of dilettantism

File: 20023863_360408301040065_2296772954994949378_o.jpg (193KB, 1641x1195px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 1641x1195px

be kind, /lit/

>>9926830
>posting this pic in every one of these threads
kys

>>9927102
>one hundreds dollars of dollars
Also how do you tell if a hardback has been read unless it has been read 50+ times? The spinal fold is interior not exterior.

Confirmed for stylelet

File: 1412996407972.png (13KB, 640x712px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 640x712px

>>9927108
>genre fiction
>Bertrand cuckel

>>9927108

That Ibsen collection is brilliant.

>>9927041
>(((finkelstein)))

>>9926830
>Star Wars: leatherbound edition

>>9927108
All good apart from Russell

>>9926830
Am I pleb if I like penguin clothback books?

>>9927004
Isso não é uma pilha, meu negro, é só um livro.

>>9926906
because P&V is shit

>>9927041
Nice.

>>9927966
Stop this meme you fucking idiots and go suck off Garnett

>>9928202
Avsey or McDuff are superior choices honestly

>>9927872
yes, cause they have stiff, brittle spines, the paper is too thick and stiff, and the printed cloth cover is generally low quality. although the cover design is usually pretty good

>>9926830
Not going to lie, the B&N editions of The Arabian Nights and Le Morte d'Arthur look pretty dank.

>>9928202

P&V is for reddit.

back you go

>>9927955
but it's a recent acquisition

>>9927595
Genre fiction? Are you a fucking mong?

>>9928202
garnett is unironically better than p&v

>>9929171
is that a swiss pack of ciggies?