So turns out Evola isn't just a /pol/ meme.
I got Revolt against the modern world and liked the preface but the bulk of the work seems to be splattering of references to global ancient culture. I figured I should research these a bit for some context before going deeper.
What are some good traditionalist works that don't just regurgitate history? I'd like some structured thought.
>>9924304
>I'd like some structured thought.
You don't understand traditionalism. Traditionalism isn't a "theory" or "system" of philosophy. It's about ancient understandings of wisdom and truth. This can inevitably only be described through history.
Ride the tiger is pretty culturally relevant right now
Say you're jacking off to a can of minted peas. Over the course of a couple of weeks, try and jack off the same amount, but gradually cut back to half a can of minted peas. then 1/4, 1/8th and so forth. Over the course of 2 months you should be jacking off to almost nothing at all, and the transition to asexuality will be complete. It's not easy, but I hope this helps :)
People hate on the idea of reading Evola because /pol/ likes him but given he's cited by an influence by Bannon who is at the intersect between Trump and this new wave of right wing retards, I think his work is at least topical.
>>9924444
Quads of truth just ordered the book wish me luck
>>9924435
But Evola did just that in the preface, explain a method or purpose for the study of tradition. I can and would rather read the primary works on my own, instead of ecountering them for the first time dispersed in Revolt against the modern world, which seems to be a book to read after you have the info, and want someone to put it together/interpret it
>>9924453
> he's cited by an influence by Bannon
Wrong. Please provide evidence of this.
>>9924454
>But Evola did just that in the preface, explain a method or purpose for the study of tradition.
To study "tradition" could take lifetimes. Just read his book god damn it and go off on tangents afterwards you find interesting.
>>9924482
>mentions someone once
>an influence
Do you even know the context of what he was saying?
>>9924458
Rereading things I misremembered things and saying I thought he had Evola as an "influence" was imprecise and misleading, but still he does interestingly connect Evola to the modern right wingers
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/10/world/europe/bannon-vatican-julius-evola-fascism.html?_r=0
>>9924482
Maybe lol I didn't
>>9924514
>/lit/ the answer
>>9924304
>>9924304
>So turns out Evola isn't just a /pol/ meme.
that's where you're wrong kiddo
>>9924522
Fuck yes thank you
>>9924522
Was this autism?
I also would be interested in some structured traditionalist writings.
>>9924304
Cosmos and Transcendence by Wolfgang Smith. Short but elegantly written, deconstructs all the bs intellectual myths of modernity that masquerade as scientific "truths"
>>9928593
Thank you sir.