When it comes down to it, the only real source of information

>>9918002
Because I wasn't alive in 2000 BC, 1900 BC, 1800 BC, 1700 BC, 1600 BC, 1500 BC, 1400 BC, 1300 BC, 1200 BC, 1100 BC, 1000 BC, 900 BC, 800 BC, 700 BC, 600 BC, 500 BC, 400 BC, 300 BC, 200 BC, 100 BC, CE, 100 AD, 200 AD, 300 AD, 400 AD, 500 AD, 600 AD, 700 AD, 800 AD, 900 AD, 1000 AD, 1100 AD, 1200 AD, 1300 AD, 1400 AD, 1500 AD, 1600 AD, 1700 AD, 1800 AD, or 1900-1988 AD.

>>9918002
Experience is limited to your lifespan. Vicarious experiences allow you to transport yourself to different times and places. It allows you to gain a holistic view of history. Oddly enough, by understanding others' experiences, you also begin to understand a bit more of your own. By studying the past, you see why things are the way they are at present, and, possibly, even where they are bound to go for the future.

am i seeing there what i think i'm seeing?
isn't that very large for a flaccid one? like very

>>9918002
What is it with /lit/ asking increasingly retarded questions? I'm seriously getting pissed. None of these are worth answering.

>>9918166
It's just an excuse to post a picture Jon Hamm's massive hog, you dummy.

File: hamm.jpg (1MB, 2000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2000x3000px

>>9918179
I mean, it's fine, but nothing impressive.

>>9918199
if that's flaccid... pretty impressive dude.

>>9919106
Might be a shower

>>9918002
What constitutes an experience of the present? Is it possible to experience the future?

>>9918150
There's a reason hey call him Jon "Big Balls and" Hamm

I would gag on it desu