I read On the Fourfold Root and chunks of the World as Will and Representation, and during the former I found many references and slight corrections/simplifications to Kants Critique of Pure reason.
I just picked up a copy of Kants CoPR, however I find it so brutally obfuscated and dense that I cant help but think would I be okay with just reading Schoppies version of Idealism which seems to be built on the same foundations but made easier ( for me at least) and reaches the same points? Is it okay to use Kants critique as a reference or should i really just get through it before schop?
t. brainlet who will never 'formally' understand philosophy
>>9896571
Schopenhauer wrote a critique of Kant's philosophy, it's an appendix to The World as Will and Representation, maybe it could help you. The most important thing you need to get from Kant is his transcendental aesthetics.
Schopenhauer praises Kant's Prolegomena and recommends reading it before reading the first Critique. Also, he recommends reading the Critique in its first edition.