Why aren't you reading futurist works right now, anon?

File: NickLandBird.png (475KB, 680x474px) Image search: [Google]

475KB, 680x474px

>>9890381
To busy working on improving AI anon.

because I am not a fascist untermensch

>dude technology lmao

Might as well read Sam Harris.

Futurism isn't bad and Mussolini was a pleb for preferring fake neo-classicism.
BUT it is pretty hilarious how Marinetti mellowed down from his original "hardcore" futuristic beliefs once he actually got laid and made some money.

File: Sklovsky.jpg (17KB, 260x348px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 260x348px

But I kinda sorta am.

Cause it's really immature lmao

>>9891537
yes you are

File: PIRATE-cover-rgb.tif_.jpg (264KB, 1128x627px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 1128x627px

>>9890381
oh, i am. Bruce Sterling's work is very funny.

can't read italian

File: fut4.jpg (257KB, 911x800px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 911x800px

>>9892806
https://www.amazon.com/Critical-Writings-Filippo-Tommaso-Marinetti/dp/0374531072

The only good futurist was Pessoa.
And Pessoa wasn't even a futurist.

>>9893104
You're wrong. Marinetti is one of the greatest authors of the 20th century. You just didn't read him.

>>9891547
Fantastic painting.

>>9894684
Indeed

But we have our own strain of futurism nowadays

>>9893114
Have you read Pessoa though? I think not.

>>9895911
Yes, I've read his poems, which aren't futurist at all.

Critical Writings: New Edition

https://my.mixtape.moe/wvxgym.epub

>>9895932
>All around, as well as deep within us, the ancient, powerfully intoxicating European sun was reeling among the wine-colored clouds… And it beat down on our faces with its great crimson-flaming torch before splitting asunder and spewing itself out into infinity.
Thank you anon, that's beautiful

>>9895932
What a pity they didn't include Against passatist Venice

File: Holocaust.jpg (99KB, 730x410px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 730x410px

b/c pic related

>>9895996
What does that have to do with Futurism?

>>9895918
he's talking about his Alvaro de Campos or whatever he's called heteronym

>>9896013
I've only read his poems by his real name, but I'm definitely going to check out the ones by Alvaro de Campos

>>9895918
I really doubt you have read his poems and yet you claim he's not a futurist.

http://arquivopessoa.net/textos/2459

>/lit/ards being exposed as pseuds
Never change

I'm actually reading short stories by a modernist/impressionist writer who wrote an essay fairly negative towards futurism. Let's be honest, it was a movement with a fairly childish worldview. Their dadaist epigones created, ironically, much more meaningful art. Futurism left us some ok paintings, poems and a bunch of stillborn theoretical essays, nothing more.