Also, to make this thread more /lit/ than /his/, are there any authors that reconcile the two?
Or you could, like, read them enough to ask a more specific question rather than the formulaic "can I have X label and Y label together because I like both?"
I agree with >>9889989
your questions is far too broad to get you answer, I don't know what to tell you
>>9889985
No, Stoics are fatalists and don't believe in free will. With that, the two are very distinct.
>>9889985
Sure.
Stoicism: Do what you can but accept what you can't change.
Catholocism: Do what you can but accept which you can't change as gods greater plan.
>>9889989
What about the Stoics' view on virtue. Can Nature be substituted with God?
>>9890018
Nature is gods creation, through appreciating nature, you can appreciate god. Through learning about nature, you learn about god. Check out the beginning of natural philosophy.
>>9889985
middle school theology student pls go
Since you all are still around, I'm guessing what I know still carries some clout. How about I drip it off to the boys at pol over there? They'd be happy to do all the digging. It would invariably come to light, and all I have to do is type the right words. Tell me, why shouldn't I? After all of this, you clearly do not wish for peace. How about I drip that match?
>>9890101
Drip drip drip drip
>>9890112
Whatever else I ever did in my life, I did do one thing: I brought an entirely new meaning to the phrase "a run for your money". Isnt that right now?
>>9889985
Nobody can reconcile the two.
>>9889985
Christians love Stoics. They are famous for trying to make them seem like crypto-Christians.
>>9889985
I don't see why not.