Font Showdown

>>9870051
>
The hound of Baskervilles??
Hmmm I'll go with Windsor

Caslon

Hounds of Baskerville
>>9870061
I'm gonna guess Great Expectations

Helvetica

>>9870067
>Helvetica
Wikipedia if it were a book.
Isn't Helvetica default there?

the default one

File: 238497623.jpg (65KB, 450x372px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 450x372px

>>9870061
>>9870067
>hound of baskervilles
No. Don't mind Doyle though.

I go by authors rather than books, so it's Zoroaster, Rousseau (for entertainment only), von Sacher-Masoch, Dostoevsky, Carroll, Ezra Pound, Savitri Devi, Bradbury, and Robert Graves.

>>9870066
patrish

>>9870155
tweets, bills, and billboards

Shonar Bangla

Wingdings

T H U N D E R

I've always liked Verdana for some reason

File: 234543546.jpg (48KB, 400x462px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 400x462px

>>9870051
>Choosing anything but Times New Roman, the absolute academic standard.

Helvetica is far patrician

>>9870999
is for plebs

Choose anything besides Garamond, and you might as well be using Papyrus. Times New Roman is acceptable.

>>9870051
Century Gothic for aesthetics. The one on your pic is emboldened for some reason. Gothic №2 is fine, too, I guess.

Pragmata Pro
The best for coding

>>9870985
It feels too 2000s to me

>>9870051
The Name of the Rose?

>>9870999
>putting serifs on miniscule letters

the roman alphabet was originally only capital letters
when they carved it into stone they made a little mark on the ends of letters to prevent cracking (called a serif when written in ink)

when they started writing in ink they made smaller, loopier letters, which descended into our modern lower case letters
so serifs on lower case letters are a butt ugly historic retrocontinuity

>TL;DR Helvetica masterrace

>>9871053
Are you Mormon?

>>9871128
>implying the 2000s were worse than now

Unironically Hotdog

>>9871373
Serifs look good though.

>>9871456
Not in Times New Roman.