>Life is pain Really!?

>>9868247
Yeah, its pretty bad

I wanna read Cioran, but do I really need to read Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, Spinoza, Schopenhauer, Hegel, Kant, Nietszche, Heidegger, etccc first?

File: 1495749036313.png (243KB, 449x471px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 449x471px

>>9868266
>he hasn't started with the Greeks

>>9868270
If I need to read them, I'll read them.

>>9868276
You most certainly do

>>9868266
You will not understand what suffering means if you don't take the time to go through all of those philosophers

>>9868266
Don't forget St Paul and Kierkegaard

>>9868266
nah cioran is ez pleb shit

File: 2017-08-06 20.43.12.png (363KB, 831x720px) Image search: [Google]

363KB, 831x720px

LIFE IS LE PAIN!

File: 1400489535806.jpg (79KB, 850x587px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 850x587px

BAIN?!?

>>9868276
You don't need to read them. Ignore that pretentious cunt.

File: eraserhead1.jpg (242KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 1600x900px

>You cut them up, just like regular chickens?

File: cursed image #4897.jpg (15KB, 300x292px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 300x292px

Extremely chice thread OP

>>9868291
This. Same with Ligotti really. Just don't forget to move on to the big boys.

>>9868281
This post is great because there's many ways to interpret it.

>>9869599
>the big boys
Which are?

>>9869607
Mainländer and Weininger

>>9869607
Not him, but Descartes, Kant, Aristotle, Spinoza, Heidegger, or even Schopenhauer. These are pure philosophers.

Cioran is not a specialist, but an essayist (almost a poet) that deals seriously with philosophical questions, much like Joseph de Maistre or even Nietzsche.

>>9869665
>Weininger
Is this name for real holy shit, how can you take that seriously haha

>>9868247
All value judgements come down to 'muh feels'.

If you can get into the feels he starts from he's worth reading very much, but if you want to know 'is this feel true?' you're asking the wrong question.

Feels aren't truth-apt.

>>9869693
>Descartes
He was a great mathematican I've heard. But this man makes me rage so much, seeing his smug face, and there he is... there is in another non-fiction book I'm reading... everytime, that smug Descartes guy comes up with his funny stuff. It makes me greatly iconoclastic.

>>9869708
You might disagree, but that I think is the big problem with philosophy. Though it is not that science is fully immune from value judgement either. It is something purely human.

File: UvIZi2Tx.jpg (32KB, 469x469px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 469x469px

>>9869715
>add sunglasses
>suddenly the major French philosophers look like Oriental drug smugglers

File: prot.jpg (27KB, 300x317px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 300x317px

>>9869740
It is one of them, but it is only a problem in so far as philosophy wants it to be not the case.

Philosophy is basically a naive detour from what the sophists had already figured out desu. A few millennia later it ends up in the same place.

>>9868247
Jack Nance is that you?

>>9869581
Lynch must have based Eraserhead on Cioran, there's too much overlap

File: lynch.jpg (62KB, 452x525px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 452x525px

>>9869867
Based himself on Cioran as well. Stole his look.