"For if one cause were co-temporary with its effect, and this effect with its effect, and so on, 'tis plain there would be no such thing as succession, and all objects would be co-existent."
>>9858130
Some nigger that can't into original sin
>>9858130
He means that cause and effect are always related by time; a cause is succeeded (a time elapses) by an effect. If this were not the case, there is no reason why all things would not exist at the same time and never perish
>>9858157
What does 'co-temporary' refer to in this instance?
>>9858210
Dictionary.com says it's a variant of contemporary, so basically simultaneous