>start losing argument >call opponent a pseud and close thread

>>9831847
can some good white boy just dump al the reaction pics of DFW? Please I want to see this in a thread

>>9831858
Lurk longer

File: 1488420860318.jpg (97KB, 1298x1098px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1298x1098px

>mfw I deliberately argue without providing any real evidence or reasoning
>mfw no one can successfully refute me because there's basically nothing to refute

File: 1433175494346.png (1003KB, 1106x1270px) Image search: [Google]

1003KB, 1106x1270px

>make a mistake or misquote
>hide thread and change board

File: 1427218699276.jpg (49KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 500x500px

>enter a thread
>be hostile for no reason

>start losing argument
>call opponent an idiot who doesn't understand the subtlety of my points

File: dfw3.png (609KB, 805x741px) Image search: [Google]

609KB, 805x741px

>argue with every post without actually posting
>win every time

Troll Stephen King thread by talking about the maze in The Shining.

None of the /lit/ wizards notices I'm trolling.

>>9831920
>janitor
>banning anons

hello newfag!

>start losing argument
>shift from being combative to collaborative and come to mutual understanding

It's not hard, retards.

>>9831847
"Go back to /pol/" is the more conditioned response of the pseud.

>>9831876
probably one of the most painful moments in my daily routine

File: 1476391305740-2.png (390KB, 427x576px) Image search: [Google]

390KB, 427x576px

>derail an entire thread by giving health advice to fictional rabbit

>>9831989
OR just the appropriate response for the psueds who invade other boards with their parroted shit they gathered from pol. How do I know you're a butthurt little faggot who is angry at lit for not taking your lowbrow shit seriously?

>>9832088
> blurts out a stock "go back to /pol/" at the slightest hint of cognitive dissonance
> accuses others of 'parroted shit'
Holy cow, even IMAX doesn't project that hard.

>>9831876
haha happens to me all the time

I'm never browsing lit in a summer afternoon again

>>9832100
I have a hunch that there are two types of people who shout the pseud hymn of "go back to /pol/": 1) jews, 2) public school goyim under the age of 16.

>>9831876
I literally do this when I make typos in otherwise intelligent posts.

>>9831847
i took a creative nonfiction course taught by David Wallace back in '94

>>9832604
>creative nonfiction
ha, classic david!

>>9831922
Why the fuck would any of us read Stephen King?

>>9832596
>not deliberately making gypos to distract pseuds

File: 1aclem.png (265KB, 1299x1322px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 1299x1322px

>>9831933
>collaborate and come to mutual understanding
>continue argument from another angle pretending to be someone else

File: 1485866269074.jpg (68KB, 720x529px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 720x529px

>>9832596

>>9831858
I would have done it, but I'm black

File: kierk.jpg (14KB, 213x300px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 213x300px

>see a debate going on
>ignore the wider purpose of the post or debate and point out an inaccuracy in someones comment
>increasingly careen thread into my unrelated argument(s) until it doesn't resemble the purpose of the thread at all

should I even read infinite jest? I saw it at someones house and thumbed through it and it looked like a huge pretentious meme. I have read a number of his essays which are good though.