Is he right, /lit/?

>>9828471
No, the simple degenerate pagan is just at the beginning. He's yet to understand the glory of the resurrection and what love truly means through that community of spirit beyond death

No, that is retarded Jaden Smith tier philosophising.

Him dying is appearantly "love itself", because "He will not hate, nor kill, nor steal". All of this ignoring that all three of those things can be an expression of love and an expression of love of the greater good, E.G. a Robin Hood character hating the rich, killing them, redistributing their wealth to the poor, and preventing mass starvation. Since his death prevents him from doing all these things, and benefits things that the dead person did not love, his dead body is love itself.

Arguing about what love is, is a fairly winding road to go down because it has been defined rather loosely over the ages and differently by different cultures, but no, dying and having animals you don't care about eating your corpse is not love. The act of dying to feed hungry animals COULD be love, but is not love in this case.

This is more targeting the weaker point than if it is truly love to discriminate in favour of one person to the detriment of the greater good. Which is more interesting but ultimately gets into semantics and is a rather cynical take on human relationships.

>>9828471
Vinland Saga is nice.