In the end I think mysticism is true to some extent(it's definitely the most satisfying explanation of God), but he misses the mark trying to tie some of the religions under the mystical band wagon like Taoism and Buddhism. I would have stuck with Hinduism / Esoteric Judaism+Christianity / Sufism.
In what way does he "misses the mark"?
at least formulate a criticism we can address
>>9826481
The absolutes of Taoism and Buddhism are accessed with an ordinary(everyday) intellect, while the mystical experiences of other religions speak to another dimension of human existence. God is unmistakably perceived in His Glory.
>>9826496
The Tao most literally means "the way" the dharma is also "the way" Jesus said I am "the way", etc
>>9826496
Zen is not rational
>>9826496
>Taoism
Back to the Chapter 1 of the Daodejing you go
>Buddhism
Nope, it's the whole business of Bodhi and Arhat
>>9828064
It's the most rational thing there is