Does anyone have read this book? should I give it a try?

>>9824584
Brainlets trying to justify their brainletism with psuedoscience. Don't waste your time OP. The very name "Emotional Intelligence" is a misnomer.

>>9824625
>not having enough emotional intelligence to realize that OP want just that sort of reply and is entirely on your side

>>9824584
does have read

sweetie...

>>9824637
>emotional intelligence
stopped reading there

>>9824640
ok, sorry.
Have someone read...*

>>9824657
HAS

>>9824584
>just got 104 as your IQ test result? No worries man, check out this shit I made up for people like us:D It can matter more than IQ!:D

I have 140 EQ Ask Me Anything.

>>9825303
so have you read or not

>>9824584
https://www.quora.com/What-is-more-beneficial-in-life-a-high-EQ-or-IQ/answer/Jordan-B-Peterson?srid=ne1q

Take it from JBP the clinical psychologist, if not le anti-pomo man :DD.

>>9825303
lol EQ is just as much a made up abstract measurement as IQ. you can't dismiss one without the other.

>>9825681
t. nigger

>>9825708
no
t. superior IQ asian

File: SORT.png (18KB, 89x91px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 89x91px

>>9825346
>Take it from JBP the clinical psychologist, if not le anti-pomo man :DD
sort your resentment out

>>9825714
t. Abdul the asian guy

>>9825307
155 reporting in, step aside son.

>>9825740
wowe. if you sound the words out phonetically, it'll help with your comprehension.
>tfw low IQs try to shitpost

>>9824625
I may not be able to do math or philosophy, engineering or writing, but man am I sensitive to intelligence!

>>9825759
>when dum-dummies Abdul tries to sound smart

>>9825303
104 is still more intelligent than the main, not by a great margain but still

>>9824584
I listened to the audiobook probably ten years ago. At that time there were quite some useful and new things in there for a guy like me then with a crippling superiority complex due to being good at technical subjects.

EQ was even mentioned in my English class 13 years ago. I think the concept of considering social competence important is useful. Contrasting it with IQ is unnecessary.

Overall, the book is a bit lengthy for what it provides, and it has a certain worldview agenda that I don't like so much.

The best book for better understanding human interaction in my view is Impro by Keith Johnstone, although a bit disorganized. The concept of status transactions as being central to human interactions is very useful.

>>9825862
>Contrasting it with IQ is unnecessary
Looks like the author wasn't of the same opinion.

>>9824584

Avoid psychology books.

t.Psychologist

>>9825862
>The best book for better understanding human interaction in my view is Impro by Keith Johnstone, although a bit disorganized. The concept of status transactions as being central to human interactions is very useful.
Anything else like this?

>>9825862

Contrasting it with IQ was probably one of the main reasons it even entered public discourse in the first place. I don't think it's such a bad idea to sacrifice a fraction of the integrity of your work if it'll make a huge difference in appeal. If you're a NASA scientist part of your job includes coming up with a cute acronym in order to make all your calculations and hard work marketable.