Does this guy have anything better than Tropic of Cancer?
I'm reading Capricorn and it falls short of his first, actually it's very messy and I don't know he sort of took the same ideas from Cancer and just scribbled them everywhere. Still I like it though.
Is he more of the same or where does he take the next step?
Try Big Sur, I enjoyed it more than Tropic of Cancer, but then again Tropic of Cancer never exactly appealed to me.
>>9820296
Miller's a mixed bag, years ago when I first read the beats, I thought he was a pseud hack who tried to ham it up in Paris and all that, but years later, I realise he was actually quite a good writer, serious in his study and practice of literature.
In a nutshell, any man who teaches hismelf French by reading the works of a genius like Balzac, and then matching that with a work of terrific perversity like Moravagine must be incapable of bad writing in my book. But that's just me.