Who think this is good literature?

its good
his imagery gets under your skin and you cant get it out of the back of your head for a while after reading. i hope you're at least a little gat though to help you get past all the cumming

>>9811817
Haven't read it but I unironically love the movie.

This is one of the only books I've ever hated

>>9811817
It gave me boners. Therefore it is good.

I enjoyed it immensely when I was younger and still have a great deal of fondness for it.

pretty funny satire.

it is good.

File: images[1].jpg (7KB, 275x183px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 275x183px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USMqwGyUMM4

>>9811817
Me. But I enjoyed it for the anal sex.

>>9811843
He can't even put two sentences together

>>9811817

There's a part where a bunch of feminists appear swinging swords or something which is great fun but on the whole it's a turgid read.

>>9811817
I don't know if I would call it literature necessarily, but I *would* call it good art.

hes everything contemporary leftists are trying to be. when they try to act all 2lude4u, subversive, obscene. but he did that decades ago in such a way that he would only spawn pathetic ants of his genre.

>>9811817
The part with the 50's AIDS and liposuction was good but the rest is meh.

>>9812721
Au contraire, he can't put two sentences apart.

>>9811817
Naked Lunch is like trolling music aficionados with blurpy jazz noise.

>>9813466
He can't write
So to speak