Why are 90% of female writers either lesbos or bi? I swear, every time I look one up I find they're carpet-munching muff drivers.
LESBIANS:
Sappho; Aphra Behn; Willa Cather; Radclyffe Hall; Gertrude Stein; Elizabeth Bishop; Patricia Highsmith; Amy Lowell; Sarah Kane; Sarah Waters; Alice Walker; Marie Clair-Blais; Carol Ann Duffy; Patricia Cornwell; Jeanette Winterson; Lillian Hellman; Audre Lorde; Kay Ryan…it goes on and on. One kike bitch writes under the name “Elana Dykewomon” for fuck’s sake.
BISEXUALS:
Edith Wharton; Katherine Mansfield; Colette; Virginia Woolf; Dahne Du Maurier; Marina Tsvetaeva; Simone de Beauvoir; Djuna Barnes; Hilda Doolittle; Sylvia Townsend Warner; Edna St. Vincent Millay; Carson McCullers; Iris Murdoch; Françoise Sagan; Susan Sontag
POSSIBLE BI/LEZ:
Jane Austen (never married); Louisa May Alcott (tomboy); George Sand (wore men’s clothes); Emily Bronte (tomboy, bit of an aggressive bitch)
And if a female writer is neither dyke nor bike, 99% chance she is a radical, leftwing, SJW feminazi cunt (J.K. Rowling, Maya Angelou, Arundhati Roy, Margaret Atwood)
>>9799742
they have male brains, hence their greatness
The strive for greatness and the obsession with an art is a masculine feature.
>Sappho is a great poet because she is a lesbian, which gives her erotic access to the Muse. Sappho and the homosexual-tending Emily Dickinson stand alone above women poets, because poetry's mystical energies are ruled by a hierach requiring the sexual subordination of her petitioners. Women have achieved more as novelists than as poets because the social novel operates outside the ancient marriage of myth and eroticism.
>>9799742
Why are 90% of the male writers either homo or bi?
>>9799742
normal women write too
what they write just isn't interesting though.
There are actually three genders: male, female, and "neither fish nor fowl". These "neither fish nor fowl" often take up "art", the creation of meaningless and over-sentimental "art" being something that many failures at everything in life are attracted to.
>>9800044
Their pseudohysteria and narcissism compels them to overshare and seek attention, but homosexual males are almost never good authors. The best are very clever.
>>9799742
look up lavender linguistics. basically they worked out lesbians speak more jargons because they give less of a fuck about social norms than faggots but retain the higher verbal IQ of women.
lots of faggots write better than normie males or females, but not as well (hypercorrect grammar is a female trait, as are longer more complex sentences) nor as broadly (great vocabulary and registers in females) as lesbians can.
plus, lesbians need better mating calls, like faggots need extra plumage and sparkles.
>>9799742
>Not mentioning the dykest poet of them all
She is a nobel laurate, ya know
Flannery O'Connor
>>9800244
Checked but you're wrong.
Saki, wilde,Shakespeare, Mann, (ok I guess not capote), and many other ones
>>9800044
because great men are above conventionalities like 'gender' or 'consent'
>/lit/'s still falling in love with dykes and dead rich faggots
beautiful. never change
Camille Paglia is one of the best lesbian writers. I heard that she couldn't get laid for 10 years because she hated other lesbians so much.