ITT: dishonest literature

my diary desu

hst made up lots of shit like political candidates that had drug addictions (total lies). its hard to tell what was real and what wasn't which can be attributed to drugs and insanity

>>9798163
how is Bukowski dishonest? he wore everything that's ugly as a coat and flaunted it you peasant.

whats so much better about honest literature

All the President's Men
"Deep Throat" was not a patriot. He was Mark Felt, an FBI official who was appointed temporary acting head of the FBI when J. Edgar Hoover died, and who became irate when Nixon passed him over and chose someone else to replace Hoover. Felt got even with a series of illegal leaks that took down the Nixon White House. Nixon went to his death unaware that Felt was a traitor, and even testified on Felt's behalf at a criminal trial where Felt was eventually convicted for his abuse of power at the FBI, i.e., for ordering "black bag jobs" and break-ins of political organizations he opposed.

Watergate was not the work of a patriotic leaker, it was a political coup engineered by a resentful bureaucrat who subsequently became a convicted criminal.

Ayn rand is the obvious answer.

Sadly, Nietzsche

>>9798764
Beat me to it. García Márquez, then

>>9798858
What's your reasoning?