ITT: we pretend to be pseuds
>>9797699
> The joke is that nothing changes
>>9797699
>the conflict echoes to the inner struggle of the main character
>That which is, ultimately, *is* (italics). To change the unchanging is to say what is, isn't. But what is, is.
>>9797699
christopher nolan is a genius, the elon musk of cinema
Hey look, two identical threads!
What do you mean, "pretend"? After all my reading is that our whole life is mere pretend, did not shakespeare say that the world was a stage, and we mere mummers to grace it?
I think your question is structurally flawed at the deepest level
>>9798608
>mummers
its minstrels you dumb kike
>>9798608
Oh God I can't even tell anymore
>>9798755
i like the part with the beauty of the soul and the analogy of spook
truly elemntary
Great post :) I am quite interested in philosophy myself, though I am devising my own system, so I try to avoid reading anything that might pollute my conceptualization process.
>>9797699
>pretend to be pseuds
You know we're on /lit/, right? It's impossible to pretend to be what you already are.
I get that we're all supposed to have a big self depreciating circle jerk about how we're all pseuds but I'm unironically smarter than the rest of you.
>>9798755
You don't read Shakespeare, you watch him, you fucking pleb.
>>9800225
for you
>>9800220
nice one
>>9798608
10/10
>>9798608
Shakespeare is overrated: has a bad taste of spirit; bad understanding of the soul; insipid philosophy, insufferably psychology. The man could write, sure, but it was a stitchwork of metaphor that should have lost its relevance centuries ago. How can we even read Shakespeare after T.S. Eliot, Ezra Pound, and other obscure poets? T.S. Eliot said in an essay once, "John Donne ... [is] ... Good," (Eliot 34) and I aggree [sic] with him. The man blew Shakespeare out of the waters incarnadine.
Bibliography
Collected Essays of TS Eliot. Eliot, Terrence Spector. 1957, Six Bongs press. [Sic].
>>9797699