If this was a novel it would he considered a masterpiece and one of the most important events in modern literary history. But just because it's a film, pretentious faggots on /lit/ will dismiss it.
>inb4 dude spiderman lol
1. Its "Spider-Man", not "Spiderman".
2. Not an argument.
>>9793824
i'm game, elaborate.
sell me this concept. flesh it. flesh it!
>>9793834
Have you seen the film?
>>9793836
Weak start.
>>9793836
i recall it vaguely.
>>9793824
3. Op...easy on the super hero autism
>>9793836
doc ock and angsty james franco, right?
>>9793848
well then. you have disappointed me. i even gave you a top tier chance. you should go and read more.
>>9793824
Exhilarating argument, OP.
Describing Mary Jane's perfectly rotund and jiggling sweater puppies begging to burst free of their captivity with every heave and thrust of her body will never compare to seeing them on the big screen, magnified to the proportions of a giantess.
>>9793848
>not much point in selling something to someone who hasn't consumed it yet.
Dude, that is the entire fucking point of selling something.
If this was a novel it wouls he considered a masterpiece and one of the most important events in modern literary history. But just because it's a film, pretentious faggots on /lit/ will dismiss it.
>>9793836
I think the movies entertaining but i'm not convinced that it's a masterpiece by cinemtaic standards let alone literary standards.
>>9793982
Yeah I'm a bit on the fence about it as well.
>>9793824
The villain is so multifaceted 'cause his robot tentacles tell him to do crimes. And he's like, "But I shouldn't, robot tentacles." And they're like, "Just do it, we're in your brain now." And he's like, "Yeah, k."
>>9793965
Sixth film wasn't tho good though. It's one of the better adaptions but the portrayal of dumbledore as weak/shocked throughout would completely against his character in the book.