i don't see psychoanalysis' value as anything approaching 'scientific.' more like freud, lacan, etc. created a way of slicing up being that gives us the vocabulary to talk about certain modes of experience. i guess i would say that about everything. but what i want to know, is if hermeticism/alchemy/gnosticism is similar, not in the way jung proposed, but just in terms of creating new windows of phenomena. or do people out there believe in thoth ontologically?
pic sort of related, just picked up his hermetic tradition
poop
>>9789958
>>9789948
Evola was highly critical of psychoanalysis, he wrote a number of essays against it. But I guess you don't read Italian.
>>9790163
what does that have to do with my post? i do not care at all about evola's take on psychoanalysis, or evola for that matter. i picked up his book to learn about hermeticism
can someone other than this faggot: >>9790163
take a look at my post
>>9789948
That guy has a huge forehead
>>9790506
one thing i never got about evola was his take on forehead man