So true

>>9783006
What are some consistently good /lit/ webcomics?

File: verne_poe.png (151KB, 800x605px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 800x605px

>>9783020
Hark a vagrant

File: block5small[1].png (201KB, 599x708px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 599x708px

>>9783020

File: labyrinth.jpg (219KB, 760x596px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 760x596px

Also, this one

File: handcat.gif (16KB, 750x750px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 750x750px

And this webcomic strikes me as quite /lit/

File: harrow.jpg (197KB, 760x596px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 760x596px

>>9783176
I fucking love oglaf

File: 1500588148697.gif (1KB, 750x750px) Image search: [Google]

1KB, 750x750px

>>9783201
That is an accurate depiction of your average free will believer.

File: offering.jpg (221KB, 760x596px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 760x596px

>>9783210

>>9783238
YES

>>9783238
that made me legit uncomfortable

qqqqqqqqq

>>9783215
This seems like obvious bait. On the other hand, determinists do love limits.

>>9783006
NABOKOV BTFO!!!! PEDO ON SUICIDE WATCH!!!!

File: 232.gif (23KB, 750x1000px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 750x1000px

LOL

>>9783006
>le Nabokov can't tell a story meme
His novels have a greater focus on plot than any of Dosto's major works.

>>9783140
>ywn be tuberculosis, systematically destroying Poe's life and everything he loves until all that remains is a worn out shell of a man

>>9783215
>Not knowing that free will exists
How did you get that rod so far up your ass?

>>9783794
"Prove it"
With these words the continental philosopher freezes up, realizing their conceptualizations are intrinsically worthless. They break into a cold sweat and begin yammering about "necessary axioms" and that "they wouldn't want to live in a world where my idea isn't true". Deeps down though, they already know they've lost.

>>9783758
i dont think focus on the plot is the criticism here...

lol

https://themiddlespaces.com/2015/03/31/humanity-not-included/

>>9783873
So what's missing in Nabokov's storytelling? Clarity? Depth? Emotional engagement? Aesthetic value? He has all of those things.
"You speak three languages but you can't tell a story" is just a rephrasing of the classic misconception that Nabokov cares more about language than content.

>>9783176
kek p good

>>9783894
he does care more about language than content... i like nabokov plenty, but his desperation to be seen as the eminent public intellectual was a bit annoying. Dostoevsky was a better novelist

>>9783201
What are these called?

Existential comics is pretty fun

>>9783848
>being a sperglord analytic and posting this masturbatory shlock

>>9783999
http://www.supermegacomics.com/index.php

>>9783991
This strikes me as shallow reading. Nabokov is a really masterful crafter of stories. The problem is that it's very surgical and almost always designed in a specific way to show cracks that point to some poignant deficiency or failure on the part of the narrator.

Dostoevsky wrote messy, incredibly psychologically realistic people. Nabokov's non-narrator people are stylized in a way that we have to acknowledge is too ideal in order to meaningfully engage with the text.

File: 1499814772097.jpg (81KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 420x420px

>>9784019
>tfw not even analytic, just shitposting

>>9784041
i agree with a lot of what you are saying, and keep in mind I've only read Pnin and Lolita as far as his main works go. And i DO happen to be a huge Dostoevsky fan, but I dont think nabokov has ever written a real novel. sure both Pnin and Lolita contain beautiful writing, at times breathtaking, and of course it has a plot and i agree with what you are saying about him, but don't you notice that theres just something missing from his works. i dont know if i would call it a 'humanness' but it is something hard to put a finger on that prevents his works from really becoming novels. and Dostoevsky is on the opposite side of the spectrum where he was so unbelievably good at what Nabokov couldnt do and i think it ate Nabokov alive

>>9783991
X, therefore y. No. You didn't prove anything. I don't like him for personal reasons, and that's why the other guy is better

>>9784155
you can't prove one author is better than another, dipshit. Some people think JK Rowling is better than Joyce, and you know what? their vote counts just as much as yours in elections

>>9783006
Nabokov looks like Sir Wilfried Laurier and Dostoyevsky looks like a midget rabbi. This person is a terrible artist and the comic doesn't demonstrate any knowledge of literature besides the title of Crime and Punishment and a random piece of trivia about Nabokov.
0/10, you and the author can go jump into a grave

>>9783140
>>9783158
>>9783176
>>9783210
>>9783220
>>9783309
>>9783492
All unfunny shit
>>9783183
>>9783201
>>9783238
>>9783742
>>9784158
>>9784164
All brilliant new media masterpieces

File: 1499558566169.jpg (58KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 600x800px

>>9783879

>>9784238
I don't like you.

>>9784297
The feeling is mutual. I don't like myself either. Yet here I am all the same

>>9783238
But Donkey Lord is necessarily good otherwise he wouldn't permit us to know that we are blind.

File: 6071700.jpg (16KB, 318x269px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 318x269px

>>9783140
Cute.

File: ch-academia.gif (121KB, 2000x2500px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 2000x2500px

Is this the true comics /lit/ thread?

>>9783183
how do i interpret this?

>>9783492
Jesus, I haven't thought of this comic in years.
I remember fucking loving it, too.

>>9784238
I don't think I've ever met anyone more wrong before

>>9784427
kek, CaH was so far ahead of its time.

>>9784600
You should go look in a mirror sometime you fat faggot

>>9784238
objectively correct.

>>9784453
>how do i interpret this?
Lacking sight, the other person's true nature was unclear to him. He could therefore be deceived into thinking that they had a cat for an arm. These are the dangers of relying too much on the senses and not enough on that thing we call "common sense"

File: pipe.png (58KB, 600x175px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 600x175px

LOL

>>9784297
>>9784600
Shit, normie taste.

>>9784453
>the second guy wants to play a prank on Dave by switching his hand with handcat's human hand
>Dave accidentally grabs handcat's cat face
>Dave erroneously believes the second guy's human hand is in fact a cat face

>>9783158
Last panel made me laugh, but then again I'm kind of drunk so the bar's set pretty low as far as comedic value is concerned

>>9783176
Not funny imo

>>9783183
lol, totally incoherent but lol

>>9783201
sameb tb h

>>9783210
overwrought gasligting cliche

>>9783238
Almost interesting, maybe I just don't like the style, idk

>>9784427
<3 love, pure love and nostalgia

>>9784950
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAsdfghhtgj someone pldease, post it POST IT PLEASE I BEG OF YOU

>>9785097
thorki is the worst fucking pairing.
wait, I lied. wincest is the worst pairing.
no wait. luna is the worst pairing.
I hate fanfiction.

>>9783006

can easily tell this guy didn't read multiple, if any, of nabokov's or dosto's books

>>9784950
Garfield... easy on the pipe

>>9785749
first of all, you should say "easy on the lasagna" because he's a fat fucking cat who likes lasagna. Second, stop trying to force a shitty meme.

>>9785784
easy on the l a s a g a

>>9785784
anon... easy on the faggotry

Crime and Punishment has superb prose, and Nabokov tells good stories.

>>9786658
unless you read russian it's hard to judge Dostoevsky's prose, unless you mean Constance Garnett has good prose

>>9784238
fat autist detected

>>9784238
A+ in taste.

>>9783201
This is one of the greatest comics of all time

>>9787690
She does and is unfairly maligned 2bh

this shit reddit af

Nabakov was at least american english. Reading any writer that isn't american or Shakespeare is pointless.

>>9783894
>So what's missing in Nabokov's storytelling?
>Clarity?
No.
>Depth?
Yes.
>Emotional engagement?
Yes.
>Aesthetic value?
No.

have any of you been to /r/comics? I think it might be one of the lowest IQ subreddits. Sort by upvotes and look at what they vote to the top

I am bumping this thread because soapfoot.
>respect your neighbours

>>9784950
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NAh9oLs67Cw
Obligatory.

>>9787690
It's impossible to judge poetry in translation, but prose can be more or less so long as it isn't too poetic in the original and the translation is faithful. Cultural idioms, slang, puns and formalism can be very tricky though, and that is where the talent of the translator really shows.

Garnett has "good prose" is a very conventional sense, but she is hardly reflective of Dostoevsky's "talkativeness". Dostoevsky strives to write like one talks (obviously not 100% because that would have a lot of "lint"), to make reading a very human experience as opposed to an artificial abstraction of feelings and description for aesthetic tasting. He wants to share live butterflies as opposed to a collection prepared and pinned.

>>9790304
what the fuck did just I watch

>>9783183
>>9783201
>>9783238
>>9783742
>>9784158
>>9784164
Since no one bothers to even provide the source of these comics, despite praise for them, here it is: http://www.supermegacomics.com/index.php

File: I ain't no fortunate one.gif (1MB, 480x336px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 480x336px

>>9790304
>This runs for over an hour

>>9783183
>>9783201
>>9783238
Reminds me of those annoying fucking comics that used to get posted on /b/ (maybe /mu/?) that made absolutely no sense. Anyone remember those?

File: jerkcity.gif (12KB, 387x189px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 387x189px

>>9793445
Jerk City is the greatest webcomic ever you fuckin pleb

File: 1316452963861.jpg (103KB, 560x683px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 560x683px

>>9788857
>dialectical materialism
>thinking this is what Descartes said
>thinking Marx was some base realist

>>9783773
You will never be anything;)

>>9793494
Jerk City is "holds up spork"-tier