John Green Thread

>>9780547

I'm excited for it, anon.

People dislike him because he is open about the things that /lit/izens were taught by bullies they are supposed to be ashamed of, and as a result repressed.

>>9780547
John Greene used !!!???!???!??!? in his book once.
You do not do that.

I thought he stopped writing to focus on his being reddit: the person video career

>>9780547
john green is gross

>>9780547
c h e e r i o s
h
e
e
r
i
o
s

>>9780565
It was stupid for sure but at least it made sense in what he was trying to do

File: a2SO2j1.png (312KB, 500x430px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 500x430px

>>9780547
His books are really poorly written and he is an insufferable ultra-progressive shitlib.

But that's not what gets me about Green, what really annoys me is this fucking cheerios analogy. It annoys me because he gets his own analogy wrong. He reverses his own analogy; it should be the cereal = the woman and the eater = the man, yet he gets this the other way around and has the cereal be the man and the eater be the woman (he complains that women are held to a different standard concerning how many people they've slept with i.e. how many cereals they've eaten).

So instead his analogy should be something like: "imagine if I was looking for some cereal to eat, and then I see a bowl of cheerios that had already been chewed up and spat out 48 times before I got to it, would I really want to eat those cheerios?!".

He's the archetypal cuck, distilled down to the most basic elements. And somehow his brother is even worse.