Are there any characters in literature as mature as Griffith

yeah

He's not even as good as some Tolkien characters, and even less so than the greatest characters in literature like Leopold Bloom, Raskolnikov, Ivan Karamazov, Hamlet, Faust, Ulrich etc

>>9761837
>Raskolnikov
>mature
He's a baby who kills someone evil and literally gets deathly ill over it and is suspicious as hell about it and yet nobody suspects him because they're all idiots.

>>9761840
Everything in this post is so wrong.

First, he's 'mature' because of the descriptions Dostoyevsky makes of his psychological state after the murdering and his overcoming and confession after realizing his love for Sonya.
Second, 'mature' is a stupid word to describe any character.
Third, Porfiri (was that his name), anyway, the detective guy with the mustache suspected him and the book makes it clear that there were no proofs incriminating Raskolnikov, his mind and honesty were his downfall.

>>9761828
>>>/a/

>>9761837
Tolkien characters were trash tho, not even close to Griffith.

>>9761828
What is mature about him?

File: IMG_0222.jpg (108KB, 646x808px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 646x808px

>>9761828
he's a glorified Fernand Mondego

Mildly related, are there any books where fucking a princess is a key plot point?

>>9762655
His fashion sense

>>9762668
any books? yes. any books worth a shit? probably not.