...wut??

>>9757055
>The world is everything that is the case
>autism
>autism
>autism
>Wwhooooaaaa cool logic symbols!!!
>autism
>autism
>whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent

>>9757073
>sentence from the intro placed at the end
>ad hominem
>ad hominem
>ad hominem
>pretending to have read the book for a (you)
Where here (you) go kid.

>>9757085
hehe all according to plan, faggot

>>9757109
>typetypetypetypetype
>hehe.jpeg
>typetypetypetypetype
>masturbate.gif
>bedtime
>schoolbus is here

Hehe faggit

>>9757256

not even the guy you were replying to, but you seem cucked and triggered or w/e

>>9757267
>being this Protestant

>the world is like, made of facts, dude
>ok now shut up

The world is everything that is the case.
Everything that is the case has been the case from the very start, it can all be derived from the core of things, that which they all share and could share, the elementary propositions.
To derive everything that is the case from the core, one must first properly establish the core.
If you define your elementary propositions wrongly, wrongly establish the core, you can not correctly derive everything that is the case, and can not talk about that which you can not derive, due to your faulty base.

>>9757073
If you thought 6 was autism you're illiterate

>Everything must be based on logical facts.
like the easiest book to debunk

>>9757055

It's an explanation of two-valued TRUE-OR-FALSE) truth functions, with other philosophical ideas laid on top. The two are perhaps at cross-purposes with each other, at times, much as (early) Witty would hate and disclaim this assertion.

>forget what you meant by it even though you wrote it

Meh people in our Philosophy department seem to want their students to read it.

This book reads out like my diary. Collections of little thoughts not yet elaborated

>>9761036
Elaborate please.

>>9762584
No.

>>9757055

Yeah, it doesn't really make sense if you try to just read it through from beginning to end. It makes more sense to read the top-level statements first so you get the main flow of the argument, then go back and read the sub-points in alphabetical order

He basically solved philosophy so just read the damn book and shut up OP