Were they right?

File: image.jpg (32KB, 220x355px)

32KB, 220x355px

No, but he was

>>9748213
Both Postmodernism and Scientism/Positivism have become totally discredited. The time is due for a Thomist revival.

>>9748213
its not a very good book, I have it. My roommates cat actually pissed on it.

Mostly, they cherry pick quotes out of context and then comment "Can, you believe this guy!?!?". Their presentation of evidence lacks an argument backing it up.

>>9748248
>pick quotes out of context
So you didn't read it? because it actually overcontextualizes, having nearly entire pages copy and pasted verbatim.

>>9748242
>Both Postmodernism and Scientism/Positivism have become totally discredited
That's almost the position they were arguing for in the book.
It's as if no one read the book and just got triggered that their favorite frenchie got called out for filling their texts with unhelpful jargon they themselves don't understand.
>>9748248
If my cat pisses on The Western Canon then clearly all the books mentioned in it must be bad because why else would a cat piss on it, clearly it must be telling of the content right?

File: 1499728410410.png (530KB, 718x862px) Image search: [Google]

530KB, 718x862px

>>9749400

>not interpreting the signs the gods send you

>>9749400
>If my cat pisses on The Western Canon then clearly all the books mentioned in it must be bad because why else would a cat piss on it, clearly it must be telling of the content right?
But The Western Canon IS bad. It's literally all dead white males...