Genius or gibberish? Should I spend months or years studying

>>9747697
High quality gibberish

genius
>which will eventually have to be abandoned

read the heidegger SEP article and it makes it dramatically easier

>>9747701
is it kino?

>>9747697
Gibberish.

Read only Spinoza and then Wittgenstein. Then wash your hands of philosophy.

absolute genius, then you get to Time

>>9748066
Why do people still believe that late Wittgenstein dissolved philosophy even though all the later analytics tore ordinary language philosophy to shreds?

>>9748159
Rec me some of those analytics

>>9748169
Grice and anything concerning the development of formal semantics

What really did the ordinary language philosophers in was the success of formal semantics, which they claimed could never capture language.

>>9748193
>the success of formal semantics
please share with me the happy message

>>9748220
Pragmatics and meaning really are different and you can formalize context dependence and all sorts of shit. I'm not a semanticist unfortunately, I'm just relaying basic points.

>>9748220
>>9748238
I guess you might count Naming and Necessity as a piece of bringing down ordinary language philosophy too.

Why not both OP?

>>9747697
you would know more about b&t if you had no philosophical background than the opposite