try me
There are literally no arguments for nominalism so why don't you try yourself lad?
>i'm a nominalist
>i belong to a class
It's like ottery
>>9747546
good point
>people call me a nominalist
more like
Define I
Define am
Define a
Define me
Define try
Who is to do the trying?
Why do you post an image depicting a female when clearly it is semantically nonsensical?
>>9747486
>claims to be a nominalist
>isn't homeless
>>9747546
why is /lit/ so good today
>now, click all the squares with pants
you had me at hello
Philosophers are those who love wisdom. Nominalists claim that forma like wisdom are just linguistic conventions. It is impossible to love linguistic conventions. Therefore, nominalists are not philosophers.
>>9747486
what is a normalist? is that like being a normie and using normie philosophy but being part of the (((ascended))) ?
>>9747638
>It is impossible to love linguistic conventions
so naïve
>>9747617
why do you say this? was diogenes a nommy or something?