Thread replies: 19
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
What would you do that?
>>
Switch track then immediately switch it back is the only objectively correct answer otherwise you don't get accredited for the kills
>>
>>9746860
>What would you do that?
*What would you do?
>>
What's the catch here?
Switching the track is the only right answer?
Is it supposed to convey the idea that you would feel worse for switching the tracks since you caused the person to die by pressing it, instead of letting the train run its course and you not feel guilty? You still would since you're still holding the switch.
>>
Non-action is always morally blameless.
>>
>>
>>9746860
Yodel along with the rest of them; there is no reason to be unhappy in your workplace, even on the railroad. Unless this is in a valley where yodelling is unsuitable, in which case that is an entirely different situation and one should report them.
>>
File: C57DA4D43C784D129C7C4300ECAED293.jpg (65KB, 600x317px) Image search:
[Google]
65KB, 600x317px
In this case the choice is easy.
>>
>>9746860
Pull the lever half way so the trolley derails?
>>
>>
>>9746860
You stay the fuck away from the lever instead of playing God
>>
wipe the metal detector for prints and gtfo
>>
>>9746865
I have this answer but not as a joke. Just fuck around with the switch. Now you've created the opportunity for less people to be killed without committing yourself to murder.
>>
I love how "ethics" is mainly concerned with when it's ok to murder people.
This is how you get professors skulling people with bike locks.
>>
>>9747924
>it's always right to punch Nazis
>everyone that disagrees with me is a Nazi
>>
>>9747624
that car is probably rusted to shit by now anyways
>>
File: multi-track-drifting-15209810.png (155KB, 500x633px) Image search:
[Google]
155KB, 500x633px
>>9746860
>>
>>9747635
fair, but not the point
Thread posts: 19
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3