>it's the P/V translation

File: 1485203072254.jpg (9KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 250x250px

>he's jumping on the P&V hate bandwagon

>>9726551
This

>>9726503
>they still propagate this meme
For the colouring group at the back of class I ask again say it with me, I will not read or complain about what I don't like

What translation of Crime and Punishment should I read then?

>>9726562
Revised Garnett

File: jorry.png (1MB, 905x1033px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 905x1033px

>>9726551
he ain't wrong though

>>9726551
>>9726558
>B-but reddit told me its good

Switched from P/V Notes from Underground to the Oxford one and it was night and day.

>it's a 4chan critiquing translations when they haven't and can't read the original and have only read one translation of the book in their language episode

>>9726903
>you have to read the original to tell if a translation is dogshit

The P/V translations seem readable to me, I don't know the bug /lit/ has up their ass about them.

>>9726562
P&V Dostoevsky is fine, OP is a shitposter who probably can't even name what's wrong with other P&V translations.

>>9726755

P&V is a /lit/ meme originally tho. Few years back it was the talk of the town, even Norm MacDonald was(is?) on the hype train.

>>9726996
The problem is they got popular. The same hipsterism happens on /mu/ and /v/ too.

>>9726996
They all read the same due to their translation process. One doesn't speak Russian.