How do I into Derrida?
>>9722337
How do I into the methodology?
How I started was by reading Lacan's seminar on The Purloined Letter and then Derrida's commentary on that seminar.
Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, Saussure, Heidegger, Lacan
>>9722342
Deconstruction is not a method and cannot be turned into one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvAwoUvXNzU
>>9722352
He's great, I wish there were lectures on Lacan and Deleuze by him as well.
>>9722501
he's fat and ugly and a liberal shit
>>9722348
this
>>9722512
sounds like he's, dare I say it, /ourguy/.
>>9722324
Jonathan Culler's "Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics, and the Study of Literature," and "On Deconstruction" will give you a good starting point.
>>9722512
>liberal
start with structure sign and play, then read voice and phenomena
drugs
>>9722348
and Wittgenstein (PI)
well, read (at least some) heidegger and definitely husserl, some levi-strauss and saussure, then read structure sign and play, white mythology, and the introduction to of grammatology (seriously, spivak explains most of it in the intro)
>>9724508
it's too bad spivak doesn't know what she's talking about and is a shitty translator.
>>9724504
Derrida apparently wasn't familiar with Wittgenstein. Reading Wittgenstein may muddy the waters a bit in comparison to reading just what 'influenced' Derrida, or rather what he responded to.
>>9722324
If you get into him, you're not getting into him at all.
Pic related.
I'm starting Of Grammatology and it opens with a quote from a text abbreviated as "EP". I've been searching the pdf for an explanation of what EP stands for and it doesn't appear to be in the version I have and I can't find the source anywhere.
Or is this some dumb Derrida joke and there really is no "(EP, p. 87)" and he's just fucking with me?
I might be losing my mind. Please help.
>>9724835
It refers to L'Écriture et la psychologie des peuples
>>9724852
Thank you!