Hey /lit/, /sci/ here. Please explain why so many of the literary

>>9713650
It's entertainment, not a scientific paper.

>>9713650
questiong thing like that is cool but if u wanna do it propose something in exchange
and i agree with u
>shortcomings of our own perceptions indeed

go back there

>>9713650
Fuck off, we're full

can you even name a philosopher who does this

>>9713650
Can you give us an example? I'm not convinced you've read much philosophy.

>>9713650
what do you mean universe cares about human will? universe is not a fucking person.

>>9713650
>so many of the literary and humanities types think that the universe in any way cares about the human will, art or beliefs? And why do many philosophers seem to think that the universe resembles a human-like mind?
Give us examples of major philosopher who state something like this.
Hard-mode: Not from the Enlightment

>>9713650

Nobody thinks that? Try /pol/ instead, youll find a lot of christians.

>>9713650
Hey /sci/, /lit/ here.
Please explain why so many people who've studied the sciences get pissed off when people who've studied the arts give ill-informed opinions on the sciences, but are perfectly happy to act like they know all about the arts when they have exactly the same level of knowledge on the subject.

On a more serious note, what are you on about? I can't think of a philosophy that believes 'the universe' cares about anything, it's usually either some sort of God caring or something that they believe humans themselves should care about.

lol @ OP thinking he's hot shit and getting humiliated effortlessly like an idiot