Are there any modern books about your typical 4chan browser?
>>9698089
Notes from the Underground
Your diary, desu.
You do know /lit/ has had an online journal at one point and not to mention several books done in collaboration.
>>9698101
are you talking about D R E A M S C A P E
bc that shit broke my brain
Anything by Tao Lin ^:
>>9698124
Has anyone actually read this here?
Is it any good?
What does it say?
>>9698089
My Twisted World
>>9698172
It's a book about 4chan written by a college girl. that should tell you all you need to know
>>9698089
The Legacy of Totalitarianism in a Tundra
Hypersphere
>>9698089
1984
>>9698573
where's ur phd bub
>>9698172
Remember the time m00t said he was interested in trying female hormones, but would rather be gay?
This is just like that.
>>9698124
>Zero Books
>>9700660
>anime macros
>>9698124
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/34858587-kill-all-normies
Is this actually well-written? wtf
>Angela Nagle writes so even-handedly and with such a fair critical eye about recent iterations of disruptive political groupings on both the right and left. On the right is the now-notorious alt-right, divided between the 'alt-light', typified by meme-making/gleefully antagonistic trolling/use of 4chan-derived argot, and the more genuinely fascistic tendencies often masked by the headline-grabbing behaviour of alt-light figures such as Milo Yiannopoulos. On the left is what Nagle sometimes refers to as 'Tumblr-liberalism', the extremely performative culture of calling-out, victimhood and competitive identity politics that seems driven by (and here I will quote Nagle quoting the late Mark Fisher, as it couldn't be paraphrased any more perfectly) 'a priest’s desire to excommunicate and condemn, an academic-pedant’s desire to be the first to be seen to spot a mistake, and a hipster’s desire to be one of the in-crowd'.
>Nagle draws a line through history from the 'culture wars' of the 1960s to those of today, arguing that the transgressive, countercultural spirit historically embodied by the anti-establishment left has been sublimated much more effectively by the modern right. She also undertakes an in-depth (though concise) review of the many, many factions of what is often sweepingly referred to as the alt-right, from 'chan culture' to the alternately pathetic and terrifying 'manosphere'. Not only is this pretty fascinating in itself, it also brings to light the serious theoretical and academic roots of certain strands of this movement – something often ignored by liberal pundits who concentrate instead on clutching their pearls at the outrageous antics of high-profile figures like Milo and Alex Jones. The idea of a handful of demagogues and professional trolls riling up people who essentially don't understand politics has been a common theme (deployed with varying levels of sensitivity) in analysis of the Trump and Brexit victories; Nagle's study shows this to be dangerously reductive.
>>9698089
A confederacy of dunces