Transcended the good-bad dichotomy desu
Joyce is duality bro.
>>9697339
neither. he's on the side of art.
>>9697339
Here's a follow-up question: Do you think Joyce was a religious man?
the side of BRAAAAAPPPPPPPs
>>9697339
He never rebelled, he was detached, he accepted everything. For him, there was absolutely no difference between a bomb falling and a leaf falling.
>>9697541
This brings up yet another good point. Do you think Joyce was a pervert in the "sicko," degenerate sense? Or just a pervert in the quirky fetish sense? Is there a difference?
>>9697556
a pervert in the "he lived to inhale pungent female farts" sense
in the grand scheme of things its a pretty modest fetishism.
>>9697339
Is it evil to fuck the farts out of a fart filled arse?
chaotic neutral
>>9697339
he was chaotic neutral
>>9697841
this
>>9697556
The difference is whether you get caught and by whom.
>>9697549
I don't think this is true, as he explicitly stated his purpose was to give Ireland a finely polished mirror to look at. So he was, even in a tiny sense, invested.
>>9697549
That said, it's a beautiful idea
>>9697339
What constitutes good and evil? I'm assuming this is some /pol/ shit? Are you asking if he was a white nationalist, OP?
>>9698586
Nah. I know that not everyone would even agree there's such a thing as good or evil. I was just kinda thinking about it from more of a gnostic position or something, I dunno.
/pol/ would hate Joycey boy because he had a chuck fetish. They'd also probably be displeased with his position on Jews in Ulysses.
All these posts about him as "detached" or "neutral," though, would make me wonder if that really just ends up supporting evil.
>>9698610
*cuck, not chuck
I imagine they wouldn't take too kindly to the BRAAAAPpening either
>>9698535
I think Nietzsche should be Chaotic good and Marx lawful evil.