>insofar as

>in which

>>9685921
>heretofore

>describing a previously mentioned noun as "said"

>qua

>>9685932
>being qua being

File: 1480107325194.jpg (131KB, 959x599px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 959x599px

>>9685921
>also
>nonetheless
>therefore
>neither/nor

File: pepethefrog.jpg (28KB, 975x600px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 975x600px

>whom of which

>>9685921
>as such

File: fjmvmV7JL1rhea3i.jpg (35KB, 500x547px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 500x547px

>to wit

>she loved me

File: CQWrgfCUcAAjPaL.jpg (12KB, 282x215px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 282x215px

>inchoate

>apropros

>quid pro quo

File: 1498250776182.jpg (303KB, 598x714px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 598x714px

>>whomst've'dnt

vis-a-vis

>in actuality

Fucking hate this, just say in reality

>tfw no gf

File: IMG_2393.jpg (114KB, 576x768px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 576x768px

>bigly

File: image2.png (356KB, 513x554px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 513x554px

>>9685921

>whole 'nother

>>9686230
yeah, what the fuck is up with that phrase, i mean it seems innocuous enough until you try to use it in a written document like an email or paper and you're like "wait, wtf is this shit?"

>>9686226
I thought it was "big league"?

>>9686237
metanalysis

>>9685921
>>9685926
>>9685952
>>9686173
Nothing wrong with any of these
>>9686230
>>9686237
"Whole nother" has ruined my writing because I'm not sure of both a proper way to write it nor an acceptable substitute.

>>9686332

"A whole other X" would be the proper way to write it.

>>9686332
a-whole-nother

File: Untitled3.png (8KB, 111x231px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 111x231px

>whilst

>>9686337
Fuck you're fucking right

File: Mee nyt vittuun.png (38KB, 1712x1920px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 1712x1920px

>kudos

>Xs X, does X
As opposed to just saying X Xs X. Baseball announcers pull this shit all the time, jams me right in

>As opposed to

File: 1467061527590.png (260KB, 484x605px) Image search: [Google]

260KB, 484x605px

>>9685921
>>9686042
>>9686123

>people who use progressively more pretentious vocabulary the longer you're arguing with them

>>9686459
I know this isn't a math board but using the same symbol for three different variables is awful

>>9686520
**people whomst use progressively more pretentious vocabulary the longer with them you're arguing

>>9686459
As supposed to

>>9685921
>>9685926
>>9685928
>>9685943
>>9685949
>>9686156
>>9686173

I assume you guys aren't native english speakers if these phrasings are frustrating you.

>and but so

>would that it were so

File: 13183530_1067681139969156_623054827_n.jpg (23KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 480x480px

>mfw I frequently used all of these words and phrases in my academic writing to make me sound smarter when I was bluffing

>>9686972
Nothing wrong with this in older English. Modern English speakers are just retarded and the subjunctive has basically fallen entirely out of use

>don't let's

>but yet

>to and fro

>>9686173
actuality connotes a more factual reality. reality is perception based.

>>9686332
"a separate piece"

>higgledy piggledy

>your correspondent

>albeit

>>9686980
unironically kys

>blackguard

>>9687543
this and
>nonetheless

>begs to differ

File: REEEEE.jpg (105KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 900x900px

>Comptroller

File: history_lad.jpg (518KB, 822x1074px) Image search: [Google]

518KB, 822x1074px

>>9685921

The single most magnificient display of this phrase/word, (or a word which amounts to the same inasmuch as it functionally a synonym) in the history of literature is pic related, from the Book of Kells.

What you're looking at is a highly stylized rendering of the Latin word "Quoniam", which means, you guessed it, "inasmuch". This is the very first word in the Gospel according to Luke.

>>9686332
>another thing altogether
or
>another thing entirely

>over fifty posts
>no one has typed 'notwithstanding' as of yet

File: 1452653547253.jpg (6KB, 219x230px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 219x230px

>trequartista

obligatory: and but for

>b/c
>cos
>becuz