Which version of Dracula should I buy?

The one where you download it for free because it's public domain.

>>9684799
this or just get a signet or penguin copy for like $3. If you really like it, get a nice copy for your display shelf after reading.

the audible audiobook, it's literally 50 cents for members, despite being like 7 hours long or some shit

>>9684786
The one written by Bram Stokker with 2 k's. It's more thorough than the Stoker version.

>>9684786

Dracula spelled backwards is Alucard

Norton if you want a bunch of really fucking awful criticism bundled with your Dracula.
Otherwise whatever copy is cheapest.

The Ignatius critical edition

>>9684786
Norton critical

>>9684898
I used to have a friend that used Alucard as her name online.

4K Remaster w/ Commentary Directed by Francis Ford Coppola

>>9685622
This

File: drac.jpg (135KB, 981x1600px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 981x1600px

The one with illustrations by Becky Cloonan seems pretty nice.

Dracula is borint as fuck after the first 100 pages. It's just a bunch of indistinguishable men acting unbearably chivalrously to a pretty girl with no character. There's a couple of good passges, but nothing mind blowing. A waste of 300 pages. Watch the movie adaptations.

>>9685871
This Anon has it absolutely right. I found Frankenstein to be a much better read.

>>9684786
Decker vs Dracula