Is it possible to prove U.G. Krishnamurti wrong?

>>9674999
No, he's just a dog barking.

>>9675002
Please elaborate.

>>9675020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOEA54Sqgno

>>9675027
Now I'm a dog too.

File: diogenes of sinope.jpg (177KB, 590x435px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 590x435px

>>9675030
Feels good, man.

>>9675030
>>9675047
BARK

File: 1498028036577.jpg (80KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 500x500px

>>9675051
bak bak bak

>>9675027
>that look of pure disgust at these hippies

'fuck that bitch'

POO

File: 1497132213170.jpg (164KB, 449x610px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 449x610px

>>9675173
now why did you do that anon

is it possible to prove the existence of an interesting conversation about ug krishnamurti

File: IMG_3853.jpg (65KB, 393x600px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 393x600px

i'm dissapointed

File: SAND_Maurice_Masques_et_bouffons_12.jpg (132KB, 384x599px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 384x599px

>>9676039
probably

yes: he cant be proved right.

>>9674999
Either way, his words are completely useless to all of us. It's like what Wittgenstein said about the lion. Or in this case, a dog.

>>9675027
He seems angrier than I would have expected....

>>9676626
useless for eating and shitting and reproducing you mean?

Do you even need to? he is speaking of something that lies outside experience. it is at the same level of religion. pure irrelevant speculation for those with too much time on their hands.

>>9676693
>he is speaking of something that lies outside experience
other way around

>it is at the same level of religion
I don't think this means anything

>speculation
you just pick whatever words sound good to you

> implying anybody here understands him at all

I'd be surprised desu

>>9676712
read more than the wikipedia please.

>>9676718
>implying he understood it

>>9676672
Yes, useless to that, and useless in any other way too.

>>9676732
>read more than the wikipedia please.
I read more than your mum

now make some other random remark instead of trying to communicate

>>9676740
so you are looking for tools to do something? what is that?

btw I don't see how you connect the lion to this guy, cause the lion you wouldn't understand, and this guy you can understand...

>>9676760
I don't think any of us can truly "understand" old U.G.. Another reference that always comes to my mind when talking about U.G. is Plato's cave story. U.G. is out of the cave, but we're still in it. As for what I'm talking about as far as uselessness, many of us would like to leave the cave, or at least think we would like to, and U.G. seems like he could help, but really he can't. Can't help, can't teach, can't nothing. That's why I compared him to Wittgenstein's lion, or a dog barking. It's like asking an animal how to achieve the mindset of an animal.

Am I expressing myself well? Please note, I'm no U.G. expert. I may have an idea of him in my head that is different from what I would find him to be if I looked into him more.

>>9676760
oh god... ok: one of his few ever repeating phrases is that all we experience is built by thought for its own continuity and that what he is talking about lies outside that experience. he says that if you stumble upon it then that 'you' disappears.

now, if you say 'the other way round' it means you havent read any of it.