What went right?

>>9666134
4+5+1=10

>>9666178

4x5x1=20

>>9666395
>>9666178
4!+5!+1! = 145
coincidence? i think not.

>>9666134
Not too much. One of the weaker "entry-level" books. Has its moments here and there. Overall just sp00py dystopia

>>9667471
What is with this 'entry-level' meme plaguing /lit/ for years now?

File: 13774604_721323268007417_1527315809_n.jpg (42KB, 320x300px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 320x300px

>>9667484
Oldfags trying to make /lit/ as inaccessible as possible.
"look at meee i read and write, i'm special... i'm different..."

>>9667484
>>9667503
There is such a thing as entry-level and you know it. The kind of books that everyone has to read in middle or high school.

>>9667522
Yes, i know it is prevalent in /lit/.
But it's been always like this.
People like high school/college reads, so? let them enjoy it.
No harm no foul, y'know.

>>9667551
Oh, I like high school books too. The Catcher in the Rye is still one of my favorites. Maybe my first post sounded too aggressive.

>>9667484
The problem with it is that some people use "entry-level" to mean starter books that are not very good, and others use it as starter books that are still very good, so you never know how to interpret it.

>>9667606
Again, just to clarify, I meant the latter.

>>9666134
Underwhelming book and a bit annoying overall.

I'd say the part when he reads to his wife and her friends was the only interesting part. I liked the fire chief at first but in retrospect his character was nonsensical.