What are /lit/'s thoughts on pick related?

>>9656932

the writing is pretty terrible but I guess good text is a spook too

>>9656937
Original german or the translation that is terrible?

>Morality is a spook
>What Hitler did was evil

>>9656932

Liked it. But the writing style is a fucking handful ranging from having an excellent flow to being a cyclone. I personally liked the philosophy of the voluntary/ involuntary egoist.

>>9657196
Hitler was Spooked AF.

>>9657196
What do you mean?

Fuck stirner, his edgyness really pisses me off

>>9657196
Non-contradiction is spooky.

>>9656932
99% of the time stirnerism is used to justify the same establishment marxist hedonist views you get from your average jewish proffesor while appearing edgy. It seems like leftists are slowly realising telling people to 'check their privilege' wont get them anywhere. but im not falling for it. Notice how 'gender', 'race', 'morality' are always spooks, but marxism is never a spook.

It's a very interesting viewpoint, but Stirner's philosophy is pretty shallow and focused on an extremely narrow track of skeptical epistemology once you get down to it.
Taking some of his points and bringing them into more comprehensive, better thought out philosophies can provide some insight.

>>9657379
who cares? it's clearly a spook in the book. that's all that matters

>>9656932
thoughts are a spook

>>9657390
That's because his book is essentially a critique of Hegel and hegelians (primarily Marx). It's not an independent "philosophy"

File: 1407407782876.jpg (157KB, 992x880px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 992x880px

>>9657379
>99% of the time stirnerism is used to justify the same establishment marxist hedonist views

>>9656932
amazing book changed my life desu.

>>9657692
>(primarily Marx)
Wrong. It's targets were Hegel and Feuerbach.

Marx wasn't even Marx when Ego came out. As a matter of fact it could be argued Marx's Marxism emerged as a response to it.

>>9657379
>Notice how 'gender', 'race', 'morality' are always spooks, but marxism is never a spook.
Because gender and race are just identities.
Marxism is about class struggle and class are objectively based on material conditions.

>>9658523
>gender isn't objectively based on biological conditions
>race isn't objectively based on biological conditions
Sure thing m8

Good for shitting on petty moralists, and bad for everything else.

>>9658523
do you unironically think stirner is a marxist?

>>9656932
>The Individual

Good luck trying to get educated on your individual school. Driving to your individual work on your individual infrastructure while shopping in your individual store. Being born from your individual self and owing nothing to other because all your influences are completely your individual. Better go whine to your individual friends whom have no impact on you and are part of your individuality.

When will this meme die?

File: 294a53db3d5b928afefc1aef62538e79a35e61dc740c907ce515ad3dd2090f56.jpg (228KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 1920x1080px

>>9658523
>>9658650
A spook does not mean "it does not exist" but it means that things like gender or race are superficials and distract you of the real struggle, the class struggle.

>>9658901
this is the most out of context shit. the quote is like saying his stuff about the mongoloid era is the thrust of his philosophy. have you ever read stirner?

>>9658901
Stirner was actually a fashy wn goy. A fascist is just an anarchist who won't let the freedom of the Weak get in the way of his freedom

>>9657379
>Notice how 'gender', 'race', 'morality' are always spooks, but marxism is never a spook.

marx and engels wrote a rebuttal against stirner that was about 3x as long as 'ego' itself because he argued against marxism. if you're gonna be a retarded frogposter at least be funny

https://archive.org/details/MaxStirnerTheUniqueAndItsProperty

>>9658901
Nice bait