Tell me your opinion on this book.

whatever

>>9640112
Up there with the best of Delillo (Libra, Underworld). I think about it more and more. Needs to be read twice to be understood.

>>9640112
Ratners star is incredible. I just wanted to say that. GR tier

>>9640131
Damn, that's high praise. I'll read it soon. That and Running Dog.

>>9640131
It's quite similar to GR, but it's not as good. Also, everytime DeLillo tries to be funny he falls flat. Anyway, his prose there and some of the thematic development is top notch.

File: doom_delillo.jpg (117KB, 620x428px)

117KB, 620x428px

"Don't you see and feel these things more acutely than you used to? The perils and warnings? Something gathering, no matter how safe you may feel in your wearable technology. All the voice commands and hyper-connections that allow you to become disembodied...Do you think about the technovirus, all systems down, global implosion? Or is it more personal? Do you feel steeped in some horrific digital panic that's everywhere and nowhere?" - Zero K

>>9640144
Come on now, the whole premise is hilarious. There's a sexual joke on every page at the expense of all STEM

>>9640160
lmao they predicted this for y2k and it never happened, nigga needs to 2 the fuck up

>>9640256
That's...That's not at all what that means, anon

>>9640256
Retard, go back to the ghetto where you came from. Literature is not the hobby for you.

cosmopolis is my favourite novel
will i dig this?

>>9640256
this post could be out of a DeLillo novel tbvh

>>9640131
the hole at the end was a vag, right?

>>9640112
pretty good, nothing great