Hypersphere @ MoMA

>>9641053
this is capital W water

Such ultracrepidarians.

>>9641102
Subtle.

Who the hell wrote Hypersphere anyways?

>>9641932
Some say Pynchon.

>>9641932
we did, anon—you and i

>>9641932
A bunch of fags here contributed to it in a google doc.

If it was created with intention, to send a message and express something, then I suppose it is art.

What is Hypershere about? Never cared about it desu

That "library of the printed web" is cringe anyway. Stuff for leftists, tumblr-cucks and pretentious girls

>>9641967
It's about shitposting. It always has been.

>>9641989
I'm seeking a serious answer, buddy

>>9642017
And you got one, friend.

>>9642020
A lot of books are about shitposting, that doesn't explain how they're all different

>>9642029
Yeah but this one is solely about shitposting.

>>9642033
It's lucrative shitposting. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TIdoWxLOs7tVlO8MHISFAm1stJ7FEta-fL0dBe88J1g/edit

>>9642039
>lucrative

Bullshit, I refuse to believe any of those books made any meaningful money.

File: wew.jpg (137KB, 500x700px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 500x700px

>tfw no bottleman bf

I actually bought that book
It's the worst one /lit/s made yet

File: Screen Shot 2017-06-16 at 9.54.53 AM.png (159KB, 1576x758px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 1576x758px

>>9642047
This would be the sales data

>>9643371
wut

>>9643376
That's a lot.
>>9643371
wtf

That means Sam Hyde is officially in the MoMA. Nice.

>>9643371
What's going on here?

>>9639885
>>9645689
did one of you fucks write this?
http://littleblogofben.blogspot.com.au/2016/01/hypersphere-review-criticism.html

honestly prefer reading the archived warosu posts of the people who wrote hypersphere than the book itself. but the book is a great read when you're high and with friends.