Thread replies: 5
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: 1394568344376.jpg (28KB, 300x300px) Image search:
[Google]
28KB, 300x300px
This is a sentence which, purposefully, describes the type of sentence I end up using again and again when I write.
Is it okay? my narration style always devolves into this long-short-long sequence, with some sort of caveat for the first clause in the second. It doesn't seem to get tiring unless you're really looking for it. Should I just do whatever as long as it works?
>>
Inner monologue?
>>
>>9628340
no, retard, you shouldn't. sentences should be designed for maximum impact on the audience.
"imagine, if you will, a thread in which OP is not a faggot"
"imagine a thread without OP's faggotry"
can you tell me the difference between these two sentences?one is not necessarily better than the other
>>
>>9628516
1: Pretentious drivel intended to make the writer and reader feel smarter than they are.
2: Straight to the point. Communicates what is necessary in order to reach maximum understanding of the intended message.
>>
>>9628516
The problem with your first example has an obviously superfluous middle clause. In my example, the word purposefully has a job to do, which is to tell you that it wasn't a coincidence.
I do understand what you're getting at, though. Your second sentence flows much better, but how do I search for this?
Thread posts: 5
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1