Most /lit/ twitter account? (don't plug your own)

>>9625512

Rushdie

@myownaccount

>>9625519
This. gotta know the zeitgeist

>>9625519
>(don't plug your own)
>plugs his own
For fuck's sake donald

@mydiarydesu #reddit

>twitter
>4chan
pick one

Peter Hitchens

>>9626457
what's up with his handle, assumed his acct was a fan acct for months

>>9625512

kantbot10k

https://twitter.com/rhystranter

lil b
cher
ayatollah khameini

Kantbot by far. His essays (and writing quality) are actually really good, interesting and well researched.

@proustitute
@thebookslut
@criticalflame
@terrypitts
@scottesposito
@MAOrtofer
@danieljhartley

>>9627589
*MAOthofer

seinfeld2000

>>9626457
>he's attributing terrorism to marijuana use again

i like to follow accounts like this to have them sprinkled through my feed:
https://twitter.com/MobyDickatSea
https://twitter.com/the__waves
https://twitter.com/TweetsOfGrass

>>9625657
You're in luck

https://twitter.com/mydiarydesu

Stop shilling your terrible pseud-philosophy kantbot

>>9625512
none
if its on twitter its not /lit/

>>9627853
>Not joining Frogtwitter.
Not wanting to co-opt the literary community and increase the barriers to entry by posting increasingly esoteric and obscure content that only highly read people can understand.

Its like you don't even want to bring literature into a post-postmodern era.

>>9627924
The problem with that is the majority of frogtwitter just straight up doesn't read the texts though. The majority of kantbots fanbase have probably only skimmed the Stanford philosophical encyclopedia on Kant, read a couple of Moldbug rants and pirated the Bell Curve before deciding they're an ""intellectual"".

All it accomplishesis a debasement of the likes of Goethe when a bunch of autistic larpers start spewing nonsensical bullshit about him.

>>9627528
This.

>>9627944
Eh, thats mainly just followers. A lot of users in the same community that have a decent amount of followers are similarly well read. He wouldn't have an audience in the first place if no one was interested in what he says. I think part of his following are just those interested in learning philosophy, reading classics and joining the community, and theres nothing wrong with that. His essays on Medium and his archive of older posts are genuinely good. At least he's getting people to read.

>>9625512
Twitter is objectively bad and so is anyone who uses it.

Follow @TheLitCritGuy for virtue-signalling leftist nonsense.