is this good? What parts that are missed here that I need to

>>9624452
>I need to read a women book

kill yourself, numale

>>9624457
Did mommy not hug you enough sweetie?

>>9624492
women are simply inferior

>>9624452
This interests me

>>9624457
>im so insecure in my intellect that i use crude, irrelevant dividing lines like genitals to give me a leg up on feeling superior

>>9624500
Please give me a well reasoned description of how they are. I'll give you time to furiously Google but I won't respond.

>30 seconds in and it already becomes a /pol/ thread
For fuck sake, just tell me already. I have this book at home but Edith's version is the one that many people call the best - I just want a list of stories that are in Edith's, and not in this.

Can somebody please say if it's good or not.

>>9624517
Read Schopenhauer's On Women.

Also, see western civilization which was built by white men like me

>>9624457
Are you motherfucking gay?

>>9624452
Why would you not just read all of the primary material detailing the myths, like Hesiod and Homer? Why would you read through so much secondary material that just says the same thing in less beautiful words? Hamilton's book is pretty decent, but it should be used as more of a reference guide than a book where you learn from.

>>9624613
Hesiod's and Homers' books do not contain everything

>>9624613
This. But if you want secondary material read Ovid's metamorphoses