Battle of the Brains

listening to molyneux makes your brain smaller and also your testicles contract

it is known

>>9616700
Jesus Crist, enough of these fucking threads. Although, if I had to choose, it would certainly be Molyneux.

Scraping the bottom of the barrel, are we?

>>9616954
>Scraping the bottom of the barrel, are we?
If you lack the purity of soul to pursue knowledge, you have no business commenting on matters of philosophy.

>>9616967
kek, btfo

>>9618330
It's true, I've been #told--thinking that Stef and Kantbot aren't top-tier is a sign that I hate the process of learning.
Stefan Molyneux's twitter is all I need to see to know that he's a meme. He might be smart, he might make good arguments--it's hard to tell underneath the showmanship, encouraging self-help language, and politics.

I'm a retard and I haven't read Kunt and I dont want to. I've heard it painfully hard to read kraut philosophers. Also I'm new to /lit/. Is Kantbot that chubby guy?
I think molymeme likes well defined arguments and that Kantbot guy would probably speak pretty ambiguously. Molymeme would get mad demanding specific arguments and eventually yell "CUT HIM OFF MIKE".

kantbot, easily
molyneux's actually a retard

Can you please stop fucking shilling this kantboy dude thank you

>Libertarian philosophers.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>9618558
Right? Libertarianism is just about the most idiotic political ideology there is.

Anyways, sage and report all threads like this. This is a literature board, not a philosophy board. And this thread has absolutely nothing to do with literature. I'm tired of seeing a bunch of autistic philosophical ideology debates shitting up this board.

is there any footage of someone talking to kantbot besides that video of him talking about thule?

like a debate or anything?

>>9618610
Have you even read any of Molyneux's books? Or how about any of Kantbot's essays? I suppose not...You're just another screaming child who craves attention.

>>9619448
Why would I waste my time with that garbage? I started philosophy with the Greeks and ended with Aquinas.

>>9619039
yes but it's part of the esoteric oral doctrine.

>>9619487
>Started with the Greeks and ended with Aquinas
Sure you did pal. Keep telling yourself that you're a well rounded individual.

>>9618374
You fucking pseud. Molyneux would destroy Kantbot in a debate. Kantbot might be smarter but he is a nerd who would choke up under Molyneux's intense line of questioning. Molyneux would reduce him to a stuttering pile of nothingness.